Regex vs LLM Text Parsing

Elevated · Review

Decision framework for choosing between regex and LLM when parsing structured text. Start with regex for deterministic patterns, add LLM only for low-confidence edge cases.

Governance Receipt

Signer
sovereign-claw-ed25519
Signed At
6/4/2026
Risk Tier
T2
Receipt Hash
b67c9003
Manifest Hash
64e88ab4c9cf3c0ef3010e5f56f79d7b7949fd8f3bee336cb5e32ecdb45d2013
Signature
epYETPJt
Root Public Key
349b0348

Skill Details

Gate Verdict
Elevated · Review
Publication State
published
Risk Tier
T2
Manifest Hash
64e88ab4

Install Regex vs LLM Text Parsing

Each bundle is served from the attested copy of Regex vs LLM Text Parsing, so the file you download is the one covered by the governance receipt on this page rather than whatever currently sits at the upstream source.

Claude Code skill

curl -L "https://atestiv.com/api/download/ecc-regex-vs-llm?format=claude-code" -o ecc-regex-vs-llm.skill.md

MCP tool definitions

curl -L "https://atestiv.com/api/download/ecc-regex-vs-llm?format=mcp" -o ecc-regex-vs-llm.mcp-tools.json

Raw attested bundle

curl -L "https://atestiv.com/api/download/ecc-regex-vs-llm?format=raw" -o ecc-regex-vs-llm.bundle.json

Verify the bundle against its manifest hash

shasum -a 256 ecc-regex-vs-llm.bundle.json

Provenance

  • Catalog identifier: ecc-regex-vs-llm
  • Harvested from the upstream repository.
  • The manifest hash below is what the signing key committed to. A bundle whose digest does not match it is not the attested Regex vs LLM Text Parsing.
  • Anything published here has been through the same gate, so a missing receipt is itself a signal rather than an omission.

More Skills